cammackay.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the cammackay.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host cammackay.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is GoDaddy.com LLC .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

skip to content home cam mackay why i don’t support the lrt through st. albert posted on october 8, 2013 by cam mackay there are a variety of reasons why i don’t support funding the lrt alignment study unlike my council colleagues: nolan crouse, cathy heron and wes brodhead. my reasons for opposing spending money on the lrt all come back to basic common sense premises that can be summarized into three arguments. flawed procedure the motion put on the table was to spend $500,000.00 on a site allocation study to determine the most viable route for lrt across st. albert. however, no feasibility study to determine whether an lrt was even a feasible project for a city of our size has ever been completed. since it is an elementary business practice to first determine whether a capital project is feasible before you decide to expend public money on such a project, i was not prepared to vote in favor of this expenditure on that ground alone. premature edmonton has not constructed any lrt line to st. albert and for this obvious reason spending money on engineering studies for a proposed route through st. albert is at best very premature. the motion calls for roughly $500,000.00 to be spent on planning a proposed route from the theoretical lrt terminus south of the superstore and proceeding north to the wal-mart along st. albert trail. why would we not wait until the lrt line is already at our doorsteps before spending money to plan a route through st. albert? this question really bothers me, especially since there is currently no federal or provincial funding for this potential edmonton – st. albert connection. in fact, the provincial and federal governments have told the city of edmonton that there isn’t enough money available to complete the southeast lrt line that edmonton is currently working on. why would we expect to have the north lrt line built and ready to be extended through st. albert any time soon when the edmonton southeast line has run out of funds? there is no money promised or allocated from either the provincial or federal government for a st. albert lrt line, nor is there any indication that the city of edmonton is ready, willing or able to construct an lrt line to st. albert’s borders. why spend $500k for an lrt study when the most likely conclusion is that the lrt will not be coming to st. albert for a very long time…if ever? economies of scale st. albert is a community of roughly 60,000 people and the proposed lrt route from the superstore to the wal-mart is approximately 8 kilometers for a total cost of 1.2 billion dollars (based on the current cost/km that edmonton is paying for their lrt expansion). in terms of cost per household or per person this translates into roughly $50,000 per house using an estimate of 24,000 dwellings in st. albert. yes, that’s right, $50,000 per household or nearly $20,000 per person in st. albert. this would become the most costly lrt per capita in north america to date and most likely for the entire globe. this would also be larger than a decade’s worth of the current budget for the city of st. albert! clearly the cost and scope of this project is far too large for a small city like st. albert. the cost of constructing an lrt through st. albert is simply too expensive for the size of the city of st. albert and based on current growth rates our city will still be too small for at least another 100+ years. conclusion i would only reconsider the possibility of voting to proceed with anything to do with an lrt line through st. albert if the following condition precedents were met: (1) a feasibility study was completed and it was established that this huge capital project is feasible for a city the size of st. albert; (2) there was some guarantee that edmonton was going to build an lrt to st. albert along with a proposed timeline for completion; and (3) the provincial and/or federal governments have committed to providing substantial funds to assist in covering the cost of building the st. albert lrt line. to date these condition precedents have not been met. posted in st. albert municipal politics , uncategorized | tagged lrt | 4 comments land use planning why it is important and who gets a say? posted on september 8, 2013 by cam mackay city council has three scopes of authority that can impact your life: bylaws, budgets and land use planning. bylaws determine what you can and cannot do, budgets determine how much money the city needs from you and land use planning determines what your home and neighborhood will look like. land use planning has been a passion of mine for some time now. in my opinion, it is what differentiates st. albert from most other communities. most communities make use of the clarence perry neighborhood unit, however i believe st. albert has perfected its application. curvilinear roads, boulevards with trees, proper setbacks, and abundant parks/green spaces are just a few examples of how st. albert has become the city we know and love. when you were looking for your home you were probably looking at a home you could afford in a neighborhood you liked, perhaps one with schools or parks nearby or one with good road access. how we plan our land use affects how much our city costs to govern and maintain, thus in a sense land use planning predetermines budgets and bylaws. this is why good land use planning a key success factor for st. albert. land use planning, and the decisions that have been made in the past, is often a large part of the reason you decided to move here and it is the reason you are willing to stay here and pay nearly double the property taxes of a comparable home next door in edmonton. since land use planning is so important, it is imperative to determine who gets to have a say in this planning. some people will state that land use planning should be left to the sole purview of public employees or experts in the field as they have the knowledge to make the best decisions. other people will often state that developers should have the primary say in land use planning, after all it is their money that is being invested. lastly, some people figure that the st. albert residents should have the final say as it is these residents who have invested their money to live in st. albert and who are going be directly impacted both financially and socially by the land use planning decisions that are made. personally, i have always felt that in st. albert the public should have a say in land use planning. we have some superb historical examples of public involvement in planning, which was a real strength of our community in the past. in my opinion, this strength has been lessened as the public has had less direct involvement and a reduced say in the land use planning happening in their community. today, our planning system could really be strengthened by including more public involvement. after all, if the public is paying the bills, should they not be entitled to have as much of a say as the developer or the civic employee? one solution, and my preferred option, is to resurrect our land use planning commission. let me know what you think… posted in st. albert municipal politics , uncategorized | tagged land use , planning , planning commission | 1 comment interview with sam posted on september 14, 2010 by admin posted in uncategorized | 1 comment taxation and spending are an issue posted on september 8, 2010 by admin you may have seen the recent editorial arguments between lynda flannery of the st. albert taxpayers association, members of council, bloggers and editorialists in the local papers. are there really people in st. albert that do not think taxation and spending would be an election issue? taxation and spending is always an issue in any election campaign and seeing how the levels of tax in st. albert are quite high i would be surprised if this was not an issue. affordability and affordable housing has been an issue in st. albert for quite some time and the level of taxation is dir

URL analysis for cammackay.com

http://cammackay.com/?tag=taxes
http://cammackay.com/?cat=6
http://cammackay.com/?p=235#comments
http://cammackay.com/?p=237#comments
http://cammackay.com/?p=232
http://cammackay.com/?p=237
http://cammackay.com/?tag=planning-commission
http://cammackay.com/?p=235
http://cammackay.com/?p=234
http://cammackay.com/?p=239
http://cammackay.com/?p=253
http://cammackay.com/?m=201009
http://cammackay.com/?author=1
http://cammackay.com/?author=4
http://cammackay.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/1990_43_13_01tn.jpg

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: CAMMACKAY.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1573485756_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2017-10-26T15:38:53Z
Creation Date: 2009-10-25T22:28:21Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-10-25T22:28:21Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS39.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS40.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2019-01-24T17:34:06Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR GoDaddy.com, LLC

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =cammackay.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME cammackay.com

  CHANGED 2017-10-26

  CREATED 2009-10-25

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS39.DOMAINCONTROL.COM 97.74.109.20

  NS40.DOMAINCONTROL.COM 173.201.77.20

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .